×

 

Suggest this Article to:

TOP INDEXERS
×

 

Suggest this Article to:

TOP ACADEMIC SEARCH ENGINES
×

 

Suggest this Article to:

TO 84 SEARCH ENGINES
  1. Google
  2. Bing
  3. Gigablast Search Index
  4. Scrubtheweb Directory
  5. Million Short
  6. Free Web Submission
  7. whatUseek
  8. Exact Seek
  9. Library of Congress
  10. Archives Hub
  11. National Archives
  12. arXiv e-Print Archive
  13. Archivenet
  14. NASA Historical Archive
  15. National Agricultural Library
  16. Smithsonian Institution Research Information System
  17. The British Library Catalogues & Collections
  18. CIA World Factbook
  19. State Legislative Websites Directory
  20. OpenDOAR
  21. Catalog of U.S. Government Publications
  22. Library of Congress
  23. Archives Hub
  24. National Archives
  25. arXiv e-Print Archive
  26. Archivenet
  27. NASA Historical Archive
  28. National Agricultural Library
  29. Smithsonian Institution Research Information System
  30. The British Library Catalogues & Collections
  31. CIA World Factbook
  32. State Legislative Websites Directory
  33. OpenDOAR
  34. Catalog of U.S. Government Publications
  35. Library of Congress
  36. Archives Hub
  37. National Archives
  38. arXiv e-Print Archive
  39. Archivenet
  40. NASA Historical Archive
  41. National Agricultural Library
  42. Smithsonian Institution Research Information System
  43. The British Library Catalogues & Collections
  44. CIA World Factbook
  45. State Legislative Websites Directory
  46. OpenDOAR
  47. Catalog of U.S. Government Publications
  48. Library of Congress
  49. Archives Hub
  50. National Archives
  51. arXiv e-Print Archive
  52. Archivenet
  53. NASA Historical Archive
  54. National Agricultural Library
  55. Smithsonian Institution Research Information System
  56. The British Library Catalogues & Collections
  57. CIA World Factbook
  58. State Legislative Websites Directory
  59. OpenDOAR
  60. Catalog of U.S. Government Publications
  61. Library of Congress
  62. Archives Hub
  63. National Archives
  64. arXiv e-Print Archive
  65. Archivenet
  66. NASA Historical Archive
  67. National Agricultural Library
  68. Smithsonian Institution Research Information System
  69. The British Library Catalogues & Collections
  70. CIA World Factbook
  71. State Legislative Websites Directory
  72. OpenDOAR
  73. Catalog of U.S. Government Publications
  74. CIA World Factbook
  75. State Legislative Websites Directory
  76. OpenDOAR
  77. Catalog of U.S. Government Publications
  78. Catalog of U.S. Government Publications


Public Article
  • verified
     

    GRAIN, STRAW YIELD AND POST HARVEST SOIL PROPERTIES OF FINGER MILLET (Eleusinecoracana .L) AS INFLUENCED BY VARIOUS SO...

     
     
         
    ISSN: 2277 - 7601

    Publisher: author   

GRAIN, STRAW YIELD AND POST HARVEST SOIL PROPERTIES OF FINGER MILLET (Eleusinecoracana .L) AS INFLUENCED BY VARIOUS SO...
Indexed in Agriculture and Food Sciences
ARTICLE-FACTOR
 1.3
Article Basics Score: 3
Article Transparency Score: 2
Article Operation Score: 3
Article Articles Score: 3
Article Accessibility Score: 2
Article Problems
Under Evaluation
article Flaws Reduces Credit

SUBMIT PAPER ASK QUESTION
International Category Code (ICC):
ICC-0202
Publisher: Multilogic In Science Multilogic In Science
Authors: Ajay Kumar E1 , Surekha K2 , Bhanu Rekha K3 And Harish Kumar Sharma S4 M.sc(Ag), Department Of Soil Science, PJTSAU Rajendranagar, Hyderabad1 Principal Scientist, Department Of Soil Science, ICAR-Indian Institute Of Rice Research, Hyd-302 Associate Profes
International Journal Address (IAA):
IAA.ZONE/227737337601
eISSN : 2277 - 7601 VALID ISSN Validator
Abstract A field experiment was carried out during Kharif, 2018 at College Farm, College of Agriculture, PJTSAU to find the effect of various sources of zinc and iron on grain, straw yield,and post harvest soil properties of finger millet. This experiment was carried out in randomized block design with 14 treatments and replicated thrice. The results revealed that application of different Zinc and iron sources at different rates significantly influenced the grain, straw yield. However, there were no significant differences in post harvest soil properties among the treatments and over initial values before experimentation. Highest grain (3653 kg ha-1 ) and straw yield (5960 kg ha-1 ) were registered from the plots applied with RDF + foliar application of FeSO4 @ 0.5% twice at 30 and 60 DAS and it was on par RDF + foliar application of Fe-humate (3612 kg ha-1 ) twice at 30 and 60 DAS. It was observed that there were no significant differences in...
Article Basics


Article Title Basics
Details


Article ISSN Validity | VALID ISSN
Details


Article Basic Information
Details


Article Editorial Team Basics
Details


Article Archive and Articles Basics
Details




 

Basics

 

Contact and Support

 

For authors

 

Legal

Home

About

Evaluation

Contact Us

Linkedin

Facebook Twitter

Guide for authors

indexarticle

ISSN Checker

Terms & Conditions

Privacy Policy

ISBN CHECKER