Public Article
-
verified
Accuracy and Applicability of Resting Metabolic Rate Prediction Equations Differ for Women Across the Lifespan
ISSN: 1929 - 5634Publisher: author   
Accuracy and Applicability of Resting Metabolic Rate Prediction Equations Differ for Women Across the Lifespan
Indexed in
Health Sciences
ARTICLE-FACTOR
1.3
Article Basics Score: 3
Article Transparency Score: 3
Article Operation Score: 3
Article Articles Score: 3
Article Accessibility Score: 2
SUBMIT PAPER ASK QUESTION
International Category Code (ICC):
ICC-0702
Publisher: Lifescience Global Inc.
International Journal Address (IAA):
IAA.ZONE/1929107455634
eISSN
:
1929 - 5634
VALID
ISSN Validator
Abstract
Background: Nutrition clinicians need accurate and reliable resting metabolic rate (RMR) assessments to determine energy needs and an appropriate nutrition care plan. Material/Methods: This cross-sectional study compared the accuracy of eight RMR prediction equations (Harris-Benedict, Robertson and Reid, Cunningham 1980, FAO/WHO/UNU, Owen, Mifflin-St. Jeor, Cunningham 1991, and Nelson) to measured RMR by indirect calorimetry among young (n=57; age: 25±3 years), midlife (n=57; age: 44±3 years), and older (n=46; age: 68±5 years) women. Paired t-tests examined differences between predicted and measured RMR. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS (version 21), with significance defined as p