×

 

Suggest this Article to:

TOP INDEXERS
×

 

Suggest this Article to:

TOP ACADEMIC SEARCH ENGINES
×

 

Suggest this Article to:

TO 84 SEARCH ENGINES
  1. Google
  2. Bing
  3. Gigablast Search Index
  4. Scrubtheweb Directory
  5. Million Short
  6. Free Web Submission
  7. whatUseek
  8. Exact Seek
  9. Library of Congress
  10. Archives Hub
  11. National Archives
  12. arXiv e-Print Archive
  13. Archivenet
  14. NASA Historical Archive
  15. National Agricultural Library
  16. Smithsonian Institution Research Information System
  17. The British Library Catalogues & Collections
  18. CIA World Factbook
  19. State Legislative Websites Directory
  20. OpenDOAR
  21. Catalog of U.S. Government Publications
  22. Library of Congress
  23. Archives Hub
  24. National Archives
  25. arXiv e-Print Archive
  26. Archivenet
  27. NASA Historical Archive
  28. National Agricultural Library
  29. Smithsonian Institution Research Information System
  30. The British Library Catalogues & Collections
  31. CIA World Factbook
  32. State Legislative Websites Directory
  33. OpenDOAR
  34. Catalog of U.S. Government Publications
  35. Library of Congress
  36. Archives Hub
  37. National Archives
  38. arXiv e-Print Archive
  39. Archivenet
  40. NASA Historical Archive
  41. National Agricultural Library
  42. Smithsonian Institution Research Information System
  43. The British Library Catalogues & Collections
  44. CIA World Factbook
  45. State Legislative Websites Directory
  46. OpenDOAR
  47. Catalog of U.S. Government Publications
  48. Library of Congress
  49. Archives Hub
  50. National Archives
  51. arXiv e-Print Archive
  52. Archivenet
  53. NASA Historical Archive
  54. National Agricultural Library
  55. Smithsonian Institution Research Information System
  56. The British Library Catalogues & Collections
  57. CIA World Factbook
  58. State Legislative Websites Directory
  59. OpenDOAR
  60. Catalog of U.S. Government Publications
  61. Library of Congress
  62. Archives Hub
  63. National Archives
  64. arXiv e-Print Archive
  65. Archivenet
  66. NASA Historical Archive
  67. National Agricultural Library
  68. Smithsonian Institution Research Information System
  69. The British Library Catalogues & Collections
  70. CIA World Factbook
  71. State Legislative Websites Directory
  72. OpenDOAR
  73. Catalog of U.S. Government Publications
  74. CIA World Factbook
  75. State Legislative Websites Directory
  76. OpenDOAR
  77. Catalog of U.S. Government Publications
  78. Catalog of U.S. Government Publications


Public Article
  • verified
     

    An Observational Study of Umbilical Cord Clamping and Care Practices during Home Deliveries in Central Uganda

     
     
         
    ISSN: 1929 - 4247

    Publisher: author   

An Observational Study of Umbilical Cord Clamping and Care Practices during Home Deliveries in Central Uganda
Indexed in Health Sciences
ARTICLE-FACTOR
 1.3
Article Basics Score: 3
Article Transparency Score: 2
Article Operation Score: 2
Article Articles Score: 2
Article Accessibility Score: 2
Article Problems
Under Evaluation
article Flaws Reduces Credit

SUBMIT PAPER ASK QUESTION
International Category Code (ICC):
ICC-0702
Publisher: Lifescience Global Inc.
Authors: Divya Shakti, Veena Singh, Gertrude Nakigozi, Sarah Kiguli, Deepak Kamat
International Journal Address (IAA):
IAA.ZONE/192991554247
eISSN : 1929 - 4247 VALID ISSN Validator
Abstract Delayed umbilical cord clamping and care practices have important implications for infant iron stores and neonatal survival. This is especially important in countries like Uganda, where there is a high prevalence of anemia in women and children coupled with a high newborn mortality rate. This study assesses cord clamping and care practices in home births in a coverage area of 12 health centers in 4 districts near Kampala, Uganda. We interviewed 147 women, most of who had at least primary school education and delivered their babies in the homes of traditional birth attendants. Only 65% of the persons conducting delivery washed hands, and most wore gloves. Most frequent cord ties were threads (86.7%), and glove rims (8.3%). Cords were cut with clean instruments in most (93.1%) deliveries. During cord clamping, newborn was positioned at a higher level than mother in 59%, delayed clamping (≥3mins) was reported in 52%. Combination of delay...
Article Basics


Article Title Basics
Details


Article ISSN Validity | VALID ISSN
Details


Article Basic Information
Details


Article Editorial Team Basics
Details


Article Archive and Articles Basics
Details




 

Basics

 

Contact and Support

 

For authors

 

Legal

Home

About

Evaluation

Contact Us

Linkedin

Facebook Twitter

Guide for authors

indexarticle

ISSN Checker

Terms & Conditions

Privacy Policy

ISBN CHECKER