[1] Akinola, A. O., Oluwaseum, T. and Tolulope, A. 2015. From reformist to pugnacious rhetoric: Julius Malema and the South African political space. Gandhi Marg Quarterly 37(1): 103-20. [2] Baillie, L., B. 2019. Exchanging focus groups for individual interviews during qualitative data collection: A discussion. Nurse Researcher 27(2): 1-15. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2019.e1633 [3] Boateng, W. 2012. Evaluating the efficacy of focus group discussion (FGD) in qualitative social research. International Journal of Business and Social Science 3(7): 54–57. [4] Breger, M. L. 2010. Making waves or keeping the calm/analyzing the institutional culture of family courts through the lens of social psychology groupthink theory. Law & Psychology Review 34(1): 55–60. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1713757 [5] Cilliers, J. and Aucoin., C. 2016. Economics, governance and instability in South Africa [ISS paper 293, June]. Institute for Security Studies. https://issafrica.org/uploads/Paper293.pdf (Accessed 5 September 2019). [6] Connelly, L. M. 2016. Trustworthiness in qualitative research. Medsurg Nursing 25(6): 435–436. [7] Creswell, J. W. and Creswell, J. D. 2018. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 5th ed. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications. [8] Crowell, S.M. 2012. The Rise of Julius Malema. repository.wellesley.edu (Accessed May 2019) [9] De Vos, A. S., Strydom, H., Schulze, S. and Patel, L. 2011. The sciences and the profession In De Vos, A. S., Strydom, H., Fouché, C. B. and Delport, C. S. L. (Eds.), The sciences and the profession. In Research at the grass roots for the social sciences and human service professions. 4th ed. Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers. [10] Elo, S., Kääriäinen, M. Kanste, O. Pölkki, T., Utriainen, K. and Kyngäs, H. 2014. Qualitative content analysis: A focus on trustworthiness. SAGE Open. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2158244014522633 [11] Fusch, P. I. and Ness, L. R. 2015. Are we there yet ? Data saturation in qualitative research. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol20/iss9/3 (Accessed 3 July 2019). [12] Günther, P. 2020. Groupthink bias in international adjudication. Journal of International Dispute Settlement 11(1): 91–126. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idaa001 [13] Harlow, B. 2015. Taking out the guesswork: Using research to build arts audiences. Bob Harlow Research and Consulting. [14] Ivanoff, S. D. and Hultberg, J. 2006. Understanding the multiple realities of everyday life: Basic assumptions in focus group methodology. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy 13(2): 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/11038120600691082 [15] Janis, I. L. 1972. Victims of groupthink. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. [16] Kook, R., Harel-Shalev, A. and Yuval, F. 2019. Focus groups and collective construction of meaning: Listening to minority women. Women Studies International Forum 72: 87–94. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.wsif.2018.12.004 [17] Krueger, R. A. and Casey, M. A. 2009. Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. 4th ed. CA: Thousand Oaks Sage. [18] Lunenburg, F. C. 2010. Decision making: The potential for groupthink. International Journal of Management, Business and Administration 13(1): 1-6. [19] Macnaghten, P. 2020. Towards an anticipatory public engagement methodology: Deliberative experiments in the assembly of possible worlds using focus groups. Qualitative Research 21(1): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1468794120919096 [20] Lorelli, S., Nowell. J. M. Norris, D. E., White, N. and Moules, J. 2017. Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 16(1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1609406917733847 [21] Northouse, P. G. 2018. Leadership: Theory and practice. 8th ed. London: SAGE. [22] Pautz, J. A. and Forrer, D. A. 2013. The dynamics of groupthink: The Cape Coral experience. Journal of International Energy Policy 2(1): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.19030/jiep.v2i1.7890 [23] Rajakumar, N. D. 2019. Why empirical studies of the groupthink model failed [CMC Senior Theses 2080. Claremont University, USA]. https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/2080 [24] Rauf, A., Baig, L., Jaffery, T. and Shafi, R. 2014. Exploring the trustworthiness and reliability of focus groups for obtaining useful feedback for evaluation of academic programs. Education for Health 27(1): 28–33. https://doi.org/10.4103/1357-6283.134303 [25] Rivaz, M., Shokrollahi, P. and Ebadi, A. 2019. Online focus group discussions: An attractive approach to data collection for qualitative health research. Journal of Nursing Practice Today 6(1): 1–3. https://doi.org/10.18502/npt.v6i1.386 [26] Rose, J. D. 2011. Diverse perspectives on the groupthink theory- a literary review. Emerging Leadership Journeys 4(1): 37–57. [27] Ryan, G., Spencer, L. M. and Bernhard, U. 2012. Development and validation of a customized competency-based questionnaire: Linking social, emotional, and cognitive competencies to business unit profitability. Cross Cultural Management Journal 19: 90-110. [28] Saunders, M. N. K. Lewis, P. and Thornhill, A. 2012. 6th ed. Research methods for business students. New York: Pearson. [29] Shenton, A. K. 2016. Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information 22: 63–75. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2004-22201 [30] Stoffel, B. 2017. Reducing groupthink : An exegetical research analysis of 1 Corinthians 13:11–14:25. Emerging Leadership Journeys 10(1): 53–69. [31] Woźniak, W. 2014. Homogeneity of focus groups as a pathway to successful research findings. Przeglad Socjologii Jakościowej 10(1): 6-23 [32] Yahalom, J. 2020.Towards a methodology of chance: On obstacles to research and their advantages. Qualitative Psychology 7(2): 153–168. https://doi.apa.org/doi/10.1037/qup0000172 [33] Young, V. 1993. Focus on focus groups: A step by step guide to running focus groups. ACRL College & Research Libraries News 54(7): 391–394 [34] Zikmund, W. G. 2000. Business research methods. 6th ed. Fort Worth, TX: Dryden Press.