×

 

Suggest this Article to:

TOP INDEXERS
×

 

Suggest this Article to:

TOP ACADEMIC SEARCH ENGINES
×

 

Suggest this Article to:

TO 84 SEARCH ENGINES
  1. Google
  2. Bing
  3. Gigablast Search Index
  4. Scrubtheweb Directory
  5. Million Short
  6. Free Web Submission
  7. whatUseek
  8. Exact Seek
  9. Library of Congress
  10. Archives Hub
  11. National Archives
  12. arXiv e-Print Archive
  13. Archivenet
  14. NASA Historical Archive
  15. National Agricultural Library
  16. Smithsonian Institution Research Information System
  17. The British Library Catalogues & Collections
  18. CIA World Factbook
  19. State Legislative Websites Directory
  20. OpenDOAR
  21. Catalog of U.S. Government Publications
  22. Library of Congress
  23. Archives Hub
  24. National Archives
  25. arXiv e-Print Archive
  26. Archivenet
  27. NASA Historical Archive
  28. National Agricultural Library
  29. Smithsonian Institution Research Information System
  30. The British Library Catalogues & Collections
  31. CIA World Factbook
  32. State Legislative Websites Directory
  33. OpenDOAR
  34. Catalog of U.S. Government Publications
  35. Library of Congress
  36. Archives Hub
  37. National Archives
  38. arXiv e-Print Archive
  39. Archivenet
  40. NASA Historical Archive
  41. National Agricultural Library
  42. Smithsonian Institution Research Information System
  43. The British Library Catalogues & Collections
  44. CIA World Factbook
  45. State Legislative Websites Directory
  46. OpenDOAR
  47. Catalog of U.S. Government Publications
  48. Library of Congress
  49. Archives Hub
  50. National Archives
  51. arXiv e-Print Archive
  52. Archivenet
  53. NASA Historical Archive
  54. National Agricultural Library
  55. Smithsonian Institution Research Information System
  56. The British Library Catalogues & Collections
  57. CIA World Factbook
  58. State Legislative Websites Directory
  59. OpenDOAR
  60. Catalog of U.S. Government Publications
  61. Library of Congress
  62. Archives Hub
  63. National Archives
  64. arXiv e-Print Archive
  65. Archivenet
  66. NASA Historical Archive
  67. National Agricultural Library
  68. Smithsonian Institution Research Information System
  69. The British Library Catalogues & Collections
  70. CIA World Factbook
  71. State Legislative Websites Directory
  72. OpenDOAR
  73. Catalog of U.S. Government Publications
  74. CIA World Factbook
  75. State Legislative Websites Directory
  76. OpenDOAR
  77. Catalog of U.S. Government Publications
  78. Catalog of U.S. Government Publications


Public Article
  • verified
     

    Clinical Comparison of Ibuprofen Drug Effect and Low Power Laser Diode on Orthodontic Separator Implementation Pain

     
     
         
    ISSN: 2292 - 2598

    Publisher: author   

Clinical Comparison of Ibuprofen Drug Effect and Low Power Laser Diode on Orthodontic Separator Implementation Pain
Indexed in Medical Sciences
ARTICLE-FACTOR
 1.3
Article Basics Score: 2
Article Transparency Score: 3
Article Operation Score: 2
Article Articles Score: 3
Article Accessibility Score: 2
Article Problems
Under Evaluation
article Flaws Reduces Credit

SUBMIT PAPER ASK QUESTION
International Category Code (ICC):
ICC-1702
Publisher: Lifescience Global Inc.
Authors: Vahid Mollabashi, Elham Maleki, Loghman Rezaei-Soufi, Sepideh Soheilifar, Payam Amini, Azadeh Kazemisaleh
International Journal Address (IAA):
IAA.ZONE/2292102672598
eISSN : 2292 - 2598 VALID ISSN Validator
Abstract Objective: Placing orthodontic separators is one of the common tasks in orthodontics. It can cause low to moderate pain, because of the pressure of the periodontal ligament and the release of prostaglandins. The purpose of this study was to compare the analgesic effects of Ibuprofen® 400mg (Gelophen, Zahravi Pharmaceutical Co, Tabriz, Iran) and LLLT on pain after the placement of orthodontics separator. Material and Methods: In this randomized clinical trial study, 61 orthodontics patients were randomly divided into two groups: group one LLLT (31 patients) and group two Ibuprofen drug (30 patients). The age of the patients was 13 to 25 years old. After obtaining informed consent from the patients, Maxillary first molars were selected to place separators in mesial and distal contacts. Results: After receiving the questionnaires, 11 patients (6 patients from the laser group and 5 patients from drug group) due to the taking of another me...
Article Basics


Article Title Basics
Details


Article ISSN Validity | VALID ISSN
Details


Article Basic Information
Details


Article Editorial Team Basics
Details


Article Archive and Articles Basics
Details




 

Basics

 

Contact and Support

 

For authors

 

Legal

Home

About

Evaluation

Contact Us

Linkedin

Facebook Twitter

Guide for authors

indexarticle

ISSN Checker

Terms & Conditions

Privacy Policy

ISBN CHECKER